|
Written by Michael
|
|
Monday, 22 June 2009 17:17 |
|

FAQ: What is Fannie Mae and why should I care?
Today, Fannie Mae (Federal National Mortgage Association - FNMA) is a private, shareholder-owned company that works to make sure mortgage money is available and affordable for of homeownership of low-, moderate-, and middle-income Americans. Although Fannie Mae does not lend money directly to home buyers, it works with lenders to make sure they do not run out of mortgage funds, so more people can achieve the dream of homeownership.
In 1968, Fannie Mae became a private company operating with private capital on a self-sustaining basis. Its role was expanded to buy mortgages beyond traditional government loan limits, reaching out to a broader cross-section of Americans.
Fannie Mae operates under a congressional charter that directs them to channel their efforts into increasing the availability and affordability of homeownership for low-, moderate-, and middle-income Americans. Yet Fannie Mae receives no government funding or backing. Fannie Mae is one of the nation's largest taxpayers as well as one of the most consistently profitable corporations in America.
FNMA currently buys FHA and VA graduated payment mortgages, adjustable-rate mortgages, and conventional fixed-rate first and some qualifying second mortgages on dwellings of one to four units. A loan that meets FNMA's underwriting criteria and dollar amount is known as a conforming loan.
------
As the above charts shows, Fannie Mae has had a spectacular rise and fall. I started thinking about this when I read a book review on Vanity Fair for 'Fannie Mae's Last Stand':
"Many believe the government-backed mortgage giants known as Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were major culprits in the economic meltdown. But, for decades, Fannie Mae had been under siege from powerful enemies, who resented its privileged status, its hard-driving C.E.O.'s, and its huge profits. Surveying Fannie's deeply dysfunctional relationships with Congress, the White House, and Wall Street, the author tells of the long, vicious war-involving most of Washington's top players-that helped propel one of the world's most successful companies off a cliff."
It sure does look like Fannie went off a cliff in 2008.... doesn't it?
-------
A healthy Fannie Mae implies a healthy housing and mortgage market. While I am not advocating that Fannie Mae needs to return to her height of glory, it does seem that this would be a good barometer to watch for signs of economic recovery. When the secondary mortgage markets begins to function and credit begins to flow at a normal pace, then many of today's buying opportunities will disappear. Making today, a good time to buy.... see homes for sale in Dallas Fort Worth.
|
|
Last Updated on Monday, 22 June 2009 22:19 |
|
|
Written by Michael
|
|
Monday, 22 June 2009 12:49 |
|

While Some Housing Prices Show Signs of Stabilization, Overall Economy is Not Helping Housing Market Recovery
Conditions that could support a housing recovery are taking shape now, but job losses, falling home prices and tight lending standards mean demand for housing remains "remarkably low," according to a new Harvard University report out today.
The 2009 State of the Nation's Housing Report from the Joint Center for Housing Studies of Harvard University concludes.
"Despite unprecedented federal efforts to jumpstart the economy and help homeowners keep up with their mortgage payments, home prices continued to fall and foreclosures continued to mount in most areas through the first quarter of 2009. While new and existing home sales and single-family starts have shown some signs of stabilizing, ongoing job losses, house price deflation, and tighter mortgage credit are placing any recovery at risk."
-----------
Despite poor economic news, some of the best buying opportunities exist today. See homes for sale in the DFW area.
-----------

The theory was simple and elegant. By offering homeowners who could not afford their monthly mortgage costs lower monthly payments, people could be able to stay in their homes. That would lower the US default and foreclosure rate, in turn building a foundation under the housing market.
The programs are simple, but they appear to be a failure.
A report about to be issued by credit rating agency Fitch says that a large number of the people who get better terms for their monthly payments still walk away from their homes. According to The Wall Street Journal, “Fitch said a conservative projection was that between 65% and 75% of modified subprime loans will fall 60-days or more delinquent within 12 months of the loan change.” That makes the problem so severe that any effort to turn home prices back in the right direction is likely to fail.
Fitch believes that a major reason people still default on their home loans is that their mortgages are “underwater”. A homeowner whose home loan is worth 150% of the value of his house may believe that he has no chance to ever recoup the equity he has invested. He may be able to stay in his residence but over time it becomes more evident that there is no financial advantage to that.
The other, and perhaps more probable cause of defaults among people who have secured better payment terms, is unemployment and under-employment. As the non-farm unemployment goes up by more than 500,000 people a month and businesses cut more people from full-time to part-time to save money, the ability of many homeowners to make mortgage payments disappears even if they desperately want to stay in their houses.
Banks do not want to cut the principal value of mortgages because it effects their balance sheets. That means that the issue of underwater mortgages may not be solved. And, the more serious issue, unemployment, shows no sign of moving in a direction that will help the housing market this year, in 2010, or even 2011.
by Douglas A. McIntyre |
|
Last Updated on Monday, 22 June 2009 20:56 |
|
Written by Michael
|
|
Saturday, 20 June 2009 09:49 |
Alt-A Loan Resets Continuing Through 2011: Analysts warn that recession woes are pushing a new group of mortgages into foreclosure.
By now, everyone has heard of sub-prime lending and knows that these home owner's home loans are often upside (the loan value is more than the home's market value). But, who has heard of 'Alt-A' loans? 'Alt-A' stands for 'Alternative-A' mortgages and if the analysts are correct, you will be hearing much more about them. Alt A is short for Alternative A-paper, a type of mortgage that is considered riskier than A-paper, or prime, but less risky than subprime, the riskiest category. Alt A loans can be issued at fixed or adjustable rates. So, there are prime loans, subprime loans, and somewhere in between is the Alt-A loan.
During the height of the housing boom, Alt-A loans came in several forms: Those made to borrowers with little or no income documentation; loans with amounts close to or greater than a home’s appraised market value; and the “pay-option” loan, the most popular, accounting for about half of all Alt-A mortgages.
Pay-option loans were originally designed for borrowers with fluctuating incomes — such as the self-employed, construction workers and tourism industry employees — who sometimes could only make minimum payments and then catch up. Wealthy people used them to purchase rental property and repay mortgages with investment profits.
The option of making a minimum payment goes away after an introductory period, often five years, when lenders begin charging the deferred principal and interest. Higher payments can be triggered sooner, when the growing balance typically reaches 110 percent to 120 percent of the original loan amount. These payment jumps are known as a recast. The biggest surge could hit in 2010 and 2011, or five years after pay option loans soared in popularity.
Now, those borrowers increasingly are discovering the true cost of their loans. When the introductory period ends, monthly payments can jump 50 percent or more on the typical Alt-A loan, far higher than many borrowers can afford.
“They were sold to the consumer as affordable but the payments on the backside are large,” said Hans Bruhner, managing partner of First Priority Financial, a Forestville mortgage company. “It was a recipe for disaster that everyone should have seen coming.”
What does this mean for the DFW Market? The following excerpts from a Dallas Morning News Article provide some insights:
- "The subprime adjustable-rate mortgages have just about worked their way through the market," said Jim Gaines, a research economist at the Real Estate Center at Texas A&M University. "Now there is another wave coming that is bigger than the subprimes."
Sub-prime Stats
- By some estimates, subprime loans once accounted for as much as 20% of the mortgage market in North Texas. They account for almost 50% of the foreclosures.
- Continuing Sub-Prime Woes: In Texas, about 8% of prime and 26% of subprime adjustable-rate loans are late, first-quarter 2009 estimates show. That works out to about 45,000 potential home foreclosures statewide.
Alt-A Stats
- In the D-FW area, there are more than 40,000 Alt A loans on the books, according to First American CoreLogic Inc. More than 9 percent of those loans are more than 60 days behind in payments.
The implication is that around another 4,000 homes in the DFW area may go into foreclosure, but this time... it is not sub-prime home owners. It is a new batch and this group includes people those whose rates were set until now and are now for the first time are being impacted by the double whammy of increased rates and lower property values.
This article was written with infomration comming from:
|
|
Written by Michael
|
|
Friday, 19 June 2009 13:11 |
|

Fixer Upper Words of Wisdom ... now, that is charming!
There is something romantic (in my opinion) about a can of paint and an old house. I know that not everyone loves the idea of fixing up an older house, but it has always appealed to me. So, I was pleased to see someone had done a little clear writing on how to think about buying a fixer upper... often referred to a house with "charm".
My favorite place to look for "charming" fixer uppers is in Dallas between Lakewood and the M Streets.
------- Items to Consider
1. Purchase Price - The lower price you pay, the more potential there is for profit it at the end. Remember, you generally make the money when you buy, not when you sell!
2. Renovation Expenses - Be as exact (and honest with yourself)as you can for each room that you are renovating, and include some "room-to-move should you be faced with the inevitable surprises (such as dampness, termite problems, legals).
3. Holdings Costs - The longer you own the home, the higher your costs for mortgage, taxes, and insurances will be.
4. Anticipated Sale Price - Be honest with yourself and compare your property like-for-like (comparable homes) with others that have SOLD.
When undertaking a renovation, take into account how long it will take to complete. From "go to woe", the market conditions could have changed immensely (for good or for bad) so try and take into account each scenario and what your subsequent actions will be (eg. if the market is worse, what would you do?)
Simply by doing your homework you'll ensure you reduce the number of surprises. Written by Simon Turner.
-------------
I also liked this list of fixer upper repair estimates.
Easy fixes are:
- Patching walls, stripping wallpaper and painting.
- Refinishing floors, laying tile or carpet.
- Installing ceiling fans and new light fixtures.
- Replacing baseboards or adding trim.
- Fixing broken windows.
- Replacing bathroom subfloors due to leaky toilet seals.
- Installing new or refacing / painting kitchen cabinets.
- Replacing doors.
- Changing out receptacles, light switches.
- Painting the exterior.
- Adding a deck.
More expensive fixes are:
- Replacing HVAC systems or adding central air.
- Shoring up foundations.
- Reroofing, when it involves a tear-off.
- Replacing all plumbing, sewer lines and electrical.
- Pouring concrete for driveways, sidewalks, steps.
- Installing replacement windows throughout.
- Complete kitchen / bath remodels.
- Building garages / additions.
written by Elizabeth Weintraub
|
|
Last Updated on Friday, 19 June 2009 14:17 |
|
Written by Michael
|
|
Thursday, 18 June 2009 09:28 |
|

Will the Obama Financial Regulatory Reform Plan Save the Day ?
The Obama administration has released its plan for how to fix the structural issues believed to be the cause of our economic woes. Will it work? You decide. I personally hope that Obama's plan is "here to save the day" although I fear that the alternative might be just as likely. The five main points of the plan are listed below along with the introductory text. I will keep you posted as the news, analysis, and my thoughts about the plan begin to surface.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Financial Regulatory Reform: A New Foundation
(1) Promote robust supervision and regulation of financial firms.
(2) Establish comprehensive supervision of financial markets.
(3) Protect consumers and investors from financial abuse.
(4) Provide the government with the tools it needs to manage financial crises.
(5) Raise international regulatory standards and improve international cooperation.
--------- the report starts with these words --------------------------------
Over the past two years we have faced the most severe financial crisis since the Great Depression. Americans across the nation are struggling with unemployment, failing businesses, falling home prices, and declining savings. These challenges have forced the government to take extraordinary measures to revive our financial system so that people can access loans to buy a car or home, pay for a child’s education, or finance a business.
The roots of this crisis go back decades. Years without a serious economic recession bred complacency among financial intermediaries and investors. Financial challenges such as the near-failure of Long-Term Capital Management and the Asian Financial Crisis had minimal impact on economic growth in the U.S., which bred exaggerated expectations about the resilience of our financial markets and firms. Rising asset prices, particularly in housing, hid weak credit underwriting standards and masked the growing leverage throughout the system.
At some of our most sophisticated financial firms, risk management systems did not keep pace with the complexity of new financial products. The lack of transparency and standards in markets for securitized loans helped to weaken underwriting standards. Market discipline broke down as investors relied excessively on credit rating agencies. Compensation practices throughout the financial services industry rewarded short-term profits at the expense of long-term value.
Households saw significant increases in access to credit, but those gains were overshadowed by pervasive failures in consumer protection, leaving many Americans with obligations that they did not understand and could not afford.
While this crisis had many causes, it is clear now that the government could have done more to prevent many of these problems from growing out of control and threatening the stability of our financial system. Gaps and weaknesses in the supervision and regulation of financial firms presented challenges to our government’s ability to monitor, prevent, or address risks as they built up in the system. No regulator saw its job as protecting the economy and financial system as a whole. Existing approaches to bank holding company regulation focused on protecting the subsidiary bank, not on comprehensive regulation of the whole firm. Investment banks were permitted to opt for a different regime under a different regulator, and in doing so, escaped adequate constraints on leverage. Other firms, such as AIG, owned insured depositories, but escaped the strictures of serious holding company regulation because the depositories that they owned were technically not “banks” under relevant law.
We must act now to restore confidence in the integrity of our financial system. The lasting economic damage to ordinary families and businesses is a constant reminder of the urgent need to act to reform our financial regulatory system and put our economy on track to a sustainable recovery. We must build a new foundation for financial regulation and supervision that is simpler and more effectively enforced, that protects consumers and investors, that rewards |
|
Last Updated on Thursday, 18 June 2009 09:35 |
|
|